Side-by-side technical data
Blackview Oscal FLAT 3C vs Oukitel C1
Comparison between Blackview Oscal FLAT 3C and Oukitel C1: camera, battery, fast charging, display, performance and colors, side by side. More phones from Blackview and Oukitel.
The verdict
Your pick: Oukitel C1, ahead on Design & display, Performance & hardware and Battery & charging. Unless Camera decides it for you.
| Category | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Design & display | 4.3 | 4.7 |
| Performance & hardware | 2.5 | 3.1 |
| Camera | 3.2 | 2.0 |
| Connectivity | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Battery & charging | 5.1 | 5.9 |
Which one is for you?
Blackview Oscal FLAT 3C, if you care about…
- Display Pixel Density
- 269 ppi
- against 225 ppi
- Body Thickness
- 8.8 mm
- against 9.2 mm
- Display Vertical Resolution
- 1,612 px
- against 1,280 px
- OS Version
- 16
- against 15
Oukitel C1, if you care about…
- AnTuTu Score
- 198,000
- against 138,000
- Maximum Storage Capacity
- 128 GB
- against 64 GB
- RAM Type
- LPDDR4X
- against LPDDR3
- Usable Surface
- 94 %
- against 82 %
Specification comparison
Performance
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | Unisoc T310 | Unisoc Tiger T603 |
| Processor Process Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Graphics GPU | — | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Maximum CPU Clock | 2 GHz Best value | 1.8 GHz |
| Maximum Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB Best value |
| AnTuTu Score | 138,000 | 198,000 Best value |
| CPU Description | 1 × ARM Cortex-A75 at 2.0 GHz + 3 × ARM Cortex-A55 at 1.8 GHz | 2× Cortex-A75 at 1.8 GHz + 6× Cortex-A55 at 1.6 GHz |
| Processor Type | Quad-Core | Octa-Core |
| 64-Bit Processor | Yes | Yes |
| RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X Best value |
| Expandable Storage | Yes | Yes |
| AnTuTu version | v10 | v10 |
Design
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Body Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Black, White, Blue, Gold, Pink |
| Body Thickness | 8.8 mm Best value | 9.2 mm |
| Body Width | 76.7 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Body Height | 165.3 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g |
| Usable Surface | 82 % | 94 % Best value |
| Body Materials | Plastic | Plastic |
| Resistance Features | IP54 | — |
| Drop Resistance Class | — | A |
| Repairability Class | — | B |
| Drop Test Count | — | 270 |
Battery
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Efficiency Rating | — | A |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,150 mAh Best value |
| Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Fast Charge Power | 10 W | — |
| Battery Features | Fast Charging, Removable | Removable |
| Charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
Display
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Display Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 16:9 |
| Display Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Display Diagonal | 6.56″ Best value | 6.52″ |
| Display Horizontal Resolution | 720 px | 720 px |
| Display Vertical Resolution | 1,612 px Best value | 1,280 px |
| Display Pixel Density | 269 ppi Best value | 225 ppi |
| Display Features | Water Drop Notch, Capacitive Touch, Multi-Touch, Frameless | Water Drop Notch, Capacitive Touch, Multi-Touch, Frameless |
Sensor
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Features | Accelerometer, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor |
Software
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| OS Family | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 16 Best value | 15 |
| Google Services | Yes | Yes |
Connectivity
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM Configurations | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby |
| Cellular Bands | 2G GSM 1900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41 | 2G GSM 1900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41 |
| Wi-Fi Standards | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) |
| Wi-Fi Features | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Bluetooth Profiles | A2DP | A2DP |
| Navigation Systems | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo |
| Connectivity Features | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, Computer Sync, OTA Sync, Tethering, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB Host 2.0, USB OTG, USB Type-C | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, Computer Sync, OTA Sync, Tethering, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB Host 2.0, USB Type-C |
Audio
| Specification | Oscal FLAT 3C | C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Features | A2DP | A2DP |
Related comparisons
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 3C vs Lava Bold N1
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 3C vs itel Zeno 20
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 3C vs Acer Acerone Liquid S272E4
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 3C vs Blackview OSCAL Marine 1
- Oukitel C1 vs Acer Acerone Liquid S272E4
- Oukitel C1 vs TCL 50 LE
- Oukitel C1 vs Lava Bold N1
- Oukitel C1 vs Oscal Flat 2
