Side-by-side technical data

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia 110 Power

Compare up to four phones using typed, normalized technical data. Measurements stay numeric, capabilities stay boolean, and options stay comparable.

Add another phone
Add another phone

The verdict

Neither runs away with it: each wins something.

Which one is for you?

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte, if you care about…

Display Technology
OLED
against TFT LCD
Maximum Storage Capacity
4 GB
against 4 MB
Display Pixel Density
200 ppi
against 100 ppi
Display Horizontal Resolution
240 px
against 120 px

Nokia 110 Power, if you care about…

Battery Capacity
1,750 mAh
against 1,000 mAh
Weight
88 g
against 150 g
SIM Configurations
Dual Mini-SIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby
against Mini-SIM
Expandable Storage
Yes
against No

Specification comparison

Battery

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Battery Efficiency Rating
Battery Capacity 1,000 mAh 1,750 mAh Best value
Battery Type Li-Ion
Fast Charge Power
Battery Features
Battery Endurance
Wireless charging power
Charge cycles
Talk time 3 h
Standby time 300 h
Music playback time

Design

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Body Colors Black Grey, Blue, Purple
Body Thickness 14.6 mm 14.2 mm Best value
Body Width 45.6 mm 50 mm
Body Height 109 mm 117.7 mm
Weight 150 g 88 g Best value
Usable Surface 24.9 %
Body Materials
Resistance Features
Waterproof Depth
Drop Resistance Class
Repairability Class
Foldable No No
Rugged Build No No
Drop Test Count
Unfolded thickness
QWERTY keyboard

Performance

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Processor Model
Processor Process Size
Graphics GPU
Storage Type
Maximum CPU Clock
Maximum Storage Capacity 4 GB Best value 4 MB
AnTuTu Score
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
CPU Description
Processor Type
64-Bit Processor
RAM Capacity 4 MB
RAM Type
Expandable Storage No Yes Best value
AnTuTu version
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Maximum memory card

Sensors

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Fingerprint Sensor Placement

Display

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Display Aspect Ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak Display Brightness
Display Technology OLED Best value TFT LCD
Display Diagonal 2″ 2″
Display Horizontal Resolution 240 px Best value 120 px
Display Vertical Resolution 320 px Best value 160 px
Display Pixel Density 200 ppi Best value 100 ppi
Display Refresh Rate
Touch Sampling Rate
Display Contrast Ratio
Display Features Scratch Resistant
Integrated Projector No No
Projector Brightness
Projector Horizontal Resolution
Projector Vertical Resolution
Cover display diagonal
Cover display refresh rate
Cover display peak brightness
Display colors 16M colors

Sensor

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Sensor Features Accelerometer

Software

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Operating System
OS Family
OS Version
OS Update Support
Direct OS Updates
Google Services
Web browser WAP 2.0/xHTML
Java (J2ME) Yes Best value No

Connectivity

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
SIM Configurations Mini-SIM Dual Mini-SIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby Best value
Cellular Bands 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS 2100 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800
Cellular Technologies GSM, UMTS Best value GSM, GPRS, EDGE
Wi-Fi Standards
Wi-Fi Features
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 2.0
Bluetooth Profiles A2DP
Navigation Systems
Connectivity Features microUSB, USB 2.0 3.5 mm Audio Jack, MP3 Player, FM Radio, microUSB
USB Version USB 2.0 microUSB
SAR American Head
SAR American Body
SAR (EU) head
SAR (EU) body
Messaging SMS, MMS, Email, Instant messaging SMS

Audio

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Microphone Count
Audio Features A2DP, Loudspeaker Loudspeaker
Alert types Vibration, Polyphonic ringtones, MP3 ringtones, Video ringtones, Downloadable ringtones

Technical

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
EAN / GTIN
UPC
Launch price
MPN
Launch price (USD)

Features

Specification 8800 Carbon Arte 110 Power
Built-in functions Audio/video player, Organizer, Photo editor, Voice memo, Predictive text input MP3 player
Google

Follow NeoTeo on Google to see more of our stories

Add as a preferred source on Google