Side-by-side technical data

O2 Cocoon vs O2 XDA Comet

Compare up to four phones using typed, normalized technical data. Measurements stay numeric, capabilities stay boolean, and options stay comparable.

Add another phone
Add another phone

The verdict

Neither runs away with it: each wins something.

Which one is for you?

O2 Cocoon, if you care about…

Bluetooth Version
Bluetooth 2.0
against Bluetooth 1.2
Display Pixel Density
175 ppi
against 148 ppi
Weight
114 g
against 145 g
Standby time
350 h
against 200 h

O2 XDA Comet, if you care about…

Usable Surface
36.7 %
against 35 %
Body Thickness
19 mm
against 21 mm
Talk time
6 h
against 5 h
Display Diagonal
2.7″
against 2.28″

Specification comparison

Battery

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Battery Efficiency Rating
Battery Capacity
Battery Type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Fast Charge Power
Battery Features
Battery Endurance
Wireless charging power
Charge cycles
Talk time 5 h 6 h Best value
Standby time 350 h Best value 200 h
Music playback time

Design

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Body Colors White Silver
Body Thickness 21 mm 19 mm Best value
Body Width 49 mm 58 mm
Body Height 94 mm 106 mm
Weight 114 g Best value 145 g
Usable Surface 35 % 36.7 % Best value
Body Materials
Resistance Features
Waterproof Depth
Drop Resistance Class
Repairability Class
Foldable No No
Rugged Build No No
Drop Test Count
Unfolded thickness 21 mm
QWERTY keyboard

Performance

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Processor Model
Processor Process Size
Graphics GPU
Storage Type
Maximum CPU Clock 0.62 GHz
Maximum Storage Capacity 1 GB
AnTuTu Score
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
CPU Description Intel XScale PXA 270 620 MHz
Processor Type
64-Bit Processor
RAM Capacity 64 MB
RAM Type
Expandable Storage Yes Yes
AnTuTu version
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Maximum memory card

Sensors

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Fingerprint Sensor Placement

Display

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Display Aspect Ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak Display Brightness
Display Technology TFT LCD TFT LCD
Display Diagonal 2.28″ 2.7″ Best value
Display Horizontal Resolution 240 px 240 px
Display Vertical Resolution 320 px 320 px
Display Pixel Density 175 ppi Best value 148 ppi
Display Refresh Rate
Touch Sampling Rate
Display Contrast Ratio
Display Features Secondary Display Resistive Touchscreen, Touchscreen
Integrated Projector No No
Projector Brightness
Projector Horizontal Resolution
Projector Vertical Resolution
Cover display diagonal
Cover display refresh rate
Cover display peak brightness
Display colors 256K colors Best value 65K colors

Sensor

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Sensor Features

Software

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Operating System Windows Mobile 6.0
OS Family Windows Mobile
OS Version 6
OS Update Support
Direct OS Updates
Google Services
Web browser WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML
Java (J2ME) Yes

Connectivity

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
SIM Configurations Mini-SIM Mini-SIM
Cellular Bands 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS 2100 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS 1900, 3G UMTS 2100
Cellular Technologies GSM, HSPA GSM, HSPA
Wi-Fi Standards Wi-Fi 802.11b/g
Wi-Fi Features Wi-Fi 802.11b/g
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 2.0 Best value Bluetooth 1.2
Bluetooth Profiles A2DP
Navigation Systems
Connectivity Features 3.5 mm Audio Jack, MP3 Player, FM Radio, USB 2.0 MP3 Player, Infrared, FM Radio, miniUSB
USB Version USB 2.0 miniUSB
SAR American Head
SAR American Body
SAR (EU) head
SAR (EU) body
Messaging SMS, MMS, Email

Audio

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Microphone Count
Audio Features A2DP, Loudspeaker Loudspeaker
Alert types Vibration, Polyphonic ringtones, MP3 ringtones, Downloadable ringtones Vibration, Downloadable ringtones, Polyphonic ringtones, MP3 ringtones

Technical

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
EAN / GTIN
UPC
Launch price
MPN
Launch price (USD)

Features

Specification Cocoon XDA Comet
Built-in functions MP3 player, Predictive text input, Organizer Handwriting recognition, Voice memo, MP3 player
Google

Follow NeoTeo on Google to see more of our stories

Add as a preferred source on Google