Side-by-side technical data
Oscal Tiger 8 vs Xiaomi Poco C75 5G
Comparison between Oscal Tiger 8 and Xiaomi Poco C75 5G: camera, battery, fast charging, display, performance and colors, side by side. More phones from Oscal and Xiaomi.
The verdict
Neither runs away with it: each wins something.
| Category | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Design & display | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Performance & hardware | 6.0 | 4.2 |
| Camera | 3.2 | 4.2 |
| Connectivity | 5.9 | 6.0 |
| Battery & charging | 5.4 | 5.6 |
Which one is for you?
Oscal Tiger 8, if you care about…
- RAM Capacity
- 8 GB
- against 4 GB
- OS Version
- 15
- against 14
Xiaomi Poco C75 5G, if you care about…
- Battery Capacity
- 5,160 mAh
- against 5,000 mAh
- Bluetooth Version
- Bluetooth 5.3
- against Bluetooth 5.0
- Peak Display Brightness
- 600 nits
- against 450 nits
- Body Thickness
- 8.2 mm
- against 8.5 mm
Specification comparison
Performance
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | Unisoc T8100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 |
| Processor Process Size | 6 nm | 4 nm Best value |
| Graphics GPU | Mali-G57 | Qualcomm Adreno 611 |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Maximum CPU Clock | 2.2 GHz Best value | 2 GHz |
| Maximum Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| AnTuTu Score | — | 391,505 |
| CPU Description | Octa-core CPU with 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. | Octa-core CPU with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. |
| Processor Type | Octa-Core | Octa-Core |
| 64-Bit Processor | — | Yes |
| RAM Capacity | 8 GB Best value | 4 GB |
| RAM Type | — | LPDDR4X |
| Expandable Storage | Yes | Yes |
| AnTuTu version | — | v10 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 141 |
Design
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Body Colors | Black, Blue | Blue, Green, Silver |
| Body Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm Best value |
| Body Width | 77.7 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Body Height | 171.1 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Weight | 210.5 g Best value | 212.4 g |
| Usable Surface | 84.6 % Best value | 84 % |
| Body Materials | — | Glass, Plastic |
| Resistance Features | — | IP52 |
| Drop Resistance Class | C | — |
| Repairability Class | B | — |
| Drop Test Count | 98 | — |
Battery
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Efficiency Rating | A | — |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh Best value |
| Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Polymer |
| Fast Charge Power | 18 W | 18 W |
| Battery Features | Fast Charging | Fast Charging, Non-Removable, Rechargeable, Battery Level Indicator |
| Battery Endurance | 53 h 38 min | — |
| Charge cycles | 800 | — |
Display
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Display Aspect Ratio | 20.5:9 | 21:9 |
| Display Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Peak Display Brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits Best value |
| Display Diagonal | 6.88″ | 6.88″ |
| Display Horizontal Resolution | 720 px | 720 px |
| Display Vertical Resolution | 1,640 px | 1,640 px |
| Display Pixel Density | 260 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Display Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Touch Sampling Rate | — | 240 Hz |
| Display Features | Mohs Level 7, 120Hz | Water Drop Notch, TÜV Rheinland Flicker-Free Certified, TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light, DCI-P3, Scratch Resistant, Curved Glass, Capacitive Touch, Frameless |
Sensors
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint Sensor Placement | Side | Side |
Sensor
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Features | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Virtual Proximity Sensing |
Software
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| OS Family | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 15 Best value | 14 |
| OS Update Support | — | 2 years |
| Google Services | — | Yes |
Connectivity
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| SIM Configurations | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby |
| Cellular Bands | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 3G UMTS B2, 3G UMTS B1, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B2, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B4, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B12, 4G LTE B17, 4G LTE B19, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B26, LTE B28, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41, 4G LTE B66, 5G NR n1, 5G NR n2, 5G NR n3, 5G NR n5, 5G NR n7, 5G NR n8, 5G NR n20, 5G NR n26, 5G NR n28, 5G NR n38, 5G NR n40, 5G NR n41, 5G NR n66, 5G NR n77, 5G NR n78 | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B28A, 4G LTE B28B, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41, 5G NR n1, 5G NR n3, 5G NR n5, 5G NR n8, 5G NR n28a, 5G NR n28b, 5G NR n40, 5G NR n78 |
| Cellular Technologies | GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G | GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Wi-Fi Standards | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) |
| Wi-Fi Features | Dual Band | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 Best value |
| Bluetooth Profiles | A2DP, LE | A2DP, LE |
| Navigation Systems | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo Best value |
| Connectivity Features | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, NFC, FM Radio, USB Type-C | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, Virtual Proximity Sensing, FM Radio, USB Type-C, Computer Sync, Infrared, OTA Sync, Tethering, VoLTE, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB Host 2.0, USB OTG |
| USB Version | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| SAR American Head | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| SAR American Body | — | 0.86 W/kg |
| Max. download speed | — | 1,000 Mbps |
Audio
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Features | A2DP, LE, Loudspeaker | A2DP, LE, EDR, HID, Loudspeaker |
Technical
| Specification | Tiger 8 | Poco C75 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Model numbers | — | MZB0IDJIN |
Related comparisons
- Oscal Tiger 8 vs Ulefone Armor X32 Pro
- Oscal Tiger 8 vs Tecno Spark 40
- Oscal Tiger 8 vs Cubot KingKong Ace 5
- Oscal Tiger 8 vs Oscal Pilot 1
- Xiaomi Poco C75 5G vs Ulefone Armor X32 Pro
- Xiaomi Poco C75 5G vs Tecno Spark 40
- Xiaomi Poco C75 5G vs Cubot KingKong Ace 5
- Xiaomi Poco C75 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M7
