Side-by-side technical data

Panasonic X700 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray 530

Compare up to four phones using typed, normalized technical data. Measurements stay numeric, capabilities stay boolean, and options stay comparable.

Add another phone
Add another phone

The verdict

Neither runs away with it: each wins something.

Which one is for you?

Panasonic X700, if you care about…

Weight
107 g
against 141 g

Panasonic Eluga Ray 530, if you care about…

Battery Capacity
3,000 mAh
against 780 mAh
Display Technology
IPS LCD
against TFT LCD
Bluetooth Version
Bluetooth 4.1
against Bluetooth 1.1
Maximum Storage Capacity
32 GB
against 8 MB

Specification comparison

Battery

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Battery Efficiency Rating
Battery Capacity 780 mAh 3,000 mAh Best value
Battery Type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Fast Charge Power
Battery Features
Battery Endurance
Wireless charging power
Charge cycles
Talk time 6 h
Standby time 250 h
Music playback time

Design

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Body Colors Black, Blue
Body Thickness 24 mm 8.3 mm Best value
Body Width 49 mm 72.2 mm
Body Height 97 mm 152.4 mm
Weight 107 g Best value 141 g
Usable Surface 26.8 % 76.2 % Best value
Body Materials
Resistance Features
Waterproof Depth
Drop Resistance Class
Repairability Class
Foldable No No
Rugged Build No No
Drop Test Count
Unfolded thickness
QWERTY keyboard

Performance

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Processor Model
Processor Process Size
Graphics GPU
Storage Type
Maximum CPU Clock 0.104 GHz 1.3 GHz Best value
Maximum Storage Capacity 8 MB 32 GB Best value
AnTuTu Score
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
CPU Description 104 MHz ARM 920T Quad-core 1.3 GHz
Processor Type Quad-Core
64-Bit Processor
RAM Capacity 3 GB
RAM Type
Expandable Storage Yes Yes
AnTuTu version
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Maximum memory card

Sensors

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Fingerprint Sensor Placement Rear

Display

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Display Aspect Ratio 18:9
Peak Display Brightness
Display Technology TFT LCD IPS LCD Best value
Display Diagonal 2″ 5.7″ Best value
Display Horizontal Resolution 176 px 720 px Best value
Display Vertical Resolution 208 px 1,440 px Best value
Display Pixel Density 136 ppi 282 ppi Best value
Display Refresh Rate
Touch Sampling Rate
Display Contrast Ratio
Display Features Secondary Display
Integrated Projector No No
Projector Brightness
Projector Horizontal Resolution
Projector Vertical Resolution
Cover display diagonal
Cover display refresh rate
Cover display peak brightness
Display colors 65K colors

Sensor

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Sensor Features Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor

Software

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Operating System Symbian 7.0 Android 8
OS Family Symbian Android
OS Version 8
OS Update Support
Direct OS Updates
Google Services
Web browser WAP 2.0/xHTML
Java (J2ME)

Connectivity

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
SIM Configurations Single Mini-SIM Dual Nano-SIM Best value
Cellular Bands 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B900, 3G UMTS 2100, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41
Cellular Technologies GSM GSM, HSPA, LTE Best value
Wi-Fi Standards Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Wi-Fi Features Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 1.1 Bluetooth 4.1 Best value
Bluetooth Profiles A2DP, LE
Navigation Systems GPS
Connectivity Features Infrared 3.5 mm Audio Jack, FM Radio, microUSB, USB 2.0, USB OTG
USB Version Proprietary USB 2.0
SAR American Head
SAR American Body
SAR (EU) head
SAR (EU) body
Messaging

Audio

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Microphone Count
Audio Features Loudspeaker A2DP, LE, Loudspeaker
Alert types Vibration, Downloadable ringtones, Polyphonic ringtones

Technical

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
EAN / GTIN
UPC
Launch price
MPN
Launch price (USD)

Features

Specification X700 Eluga Ray 530
Built-in functions Downloadable logos, Predictive text input, Document viewer, Photo editor, Voice memo, Voice dial
Google

Follow NeoTeo on Google to see more of our stories

Add as a preferred source on Google