Side-by-side technical data
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G
Comparison between Samsung Galaxy F14 4G and Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G: camera, battery, fast charging, display, performance and colors, side by side. More phones from Samsung and Blackview.
The verdict
Your pick: Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G, ahead on Performance & hardware and Connectivity. Unless Camera decides it for you.
| Category | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Design & display | 5.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance & hardware | 4.7 | 5.6 |
| Camera | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| Connectivity | 5.2 | 6.5 |
| Battery & charging | 5.6 | 5.4 |
Which one is for you?
Samsung Galaxy F14 4G, if you care about…
- Display Pixel Density
- 393 ppi
- against 260 ppi
- Weight
- 194 g
- against 210 g
- Fast Charge Power
- 25 W
- against 18 W
- Display Horizontal Resolution
- 1,080 px
- against 720 px
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G, if you care about…
- RAM Capacity
- 8 GB
- against 4 GB
- Bluetooth Version
- Bluetooth 5.2
- against Bluetooth 5.1
- Display Refresh Rate
- 120 Hz
- against 90 Hz
- Maximum Storage Capacity
- 128 GB
- against 64 GB
Specification comparison
Performance
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Unisoc Tiger T760 / T8100 |
| Processor Process Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Graphics GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | ARM Mali-G57 MP4 |
| Storage Type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Maximum CPU Clock | 2.4 GHz Best value | 2.2 GHz |
| Maximum Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB Best value |
| AnTuTu Score | — | 641,019 |
| CPU Description | Octa-core CPU with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. | 4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 + 4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 |
| Processor Type | Octa-Core | Octa-Core |
| 64-Bit Processor | — | Yes |
| RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB Best value |
| Expandable Storage | Yes | Yes |
| AnTuTu version | — | v11 |
Design
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Body Colors | Silver, Green | Black, Blue |
| Body Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.4 mm Best value |
| Body Width | 77.8 mm | 77.7 mm |
| Body Height | 168 mm | 171 mm |
| Weight | 194 g Best value | 210 g |
| Usable Surface | 82.9 % | 84 % Best value |
| Body Materials | Glass, Plastic | Plastic |
| Drop Resistance Class | — | C |
| Repairability Class | — | B |
| Drop Test Count | — | 98 |
Battery
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Efficiency Rating | — | A |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery Type | — | Li-Polymer |
| Fast Charge Power | 25 W Best value | 18 W |
| Battery Features | Fast Charging | Fast Charging, Non-Removable |
| Charge cycles | — | 800 |
Display
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Display Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Display Technology | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Peak Display Brightness | — | 700 nits |
| Display Diagonal | 6.7″ | 6.88″ Best value |
| Display Horizontal Resolution | 1,080 px Best value | 720 px |
| Display Vertical Resolution | 2,400 px Best value | 1,640 px |
| Display Pixel Density | 393 ppi Best value | 260 ppi |
| Display Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz Best value |
| Display Features | 90Hz | Water Drop Notch, 120Hz, Scratch Resistant, Curved Glass, Panda Glass, Capacitive Touch, Multi-Touch, Frameless |
Sensors
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint Sensor Placement | Side | Side |
Sensor
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Features | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor | Cooling System, Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor |
Software
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 14 | — |
| OS Family | Android | — |
| OS Version | 14 | — |
| Google Services | — | Yes |
Connectivity
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| SIM Configurations | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby, Dual Nano-SIM |
| Cellular Bands | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B20, LTE B28, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41 | 2G GSM 1900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B2, 3G UMTS B3, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B2, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B4, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B12, 4G LTE B17, 4G LTE B18, 4G LTE B19, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B26, 4G LTE B28A, 4G LTE B28B, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B39, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41, 4G LTE B66, 5G NR n1, 5G NR n2, 5G NR n3, 5G NR n5, 5G NR n7, 5G NR n8, 5G NR n20, 5G NR n26, 5G NR n28a, 5G NR n28b, 5G NR n38, 5G NR n40, 5G NR n41, 5G NR n66, 5G NR n77, 5G NR n78 |
| Cellular Technologies | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, UMTS, LTE, 5G Best value |
| Wi-Fi Standards | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) |
| Wi-Fi Features | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Direct | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 Best value |
| Bluetooth Profiles | A2DP, LE | A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC |
| Navigation Systems | GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou, QZSS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo |
| Connectivity Features | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, USB Type-C | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, Computer Sync, NFC, OTA Sync, FM Radio, Tethering, VoLTE, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB Host 2.0, USB OTG, USB Type-C |
| USB Version | USB 2.0 | — |
| SAR American Head | 0.56 W/kg | — |
Audio
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Features | A2DP, LE | Stereo Speakers, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC |
Technical
| Specification | Galaxy F14 4G | OSCAL TIGER 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Model numbers | SM-E145F, SM-E145F/DS | — |
Related comparisons
- Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Lava Blaze Duo
- Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Honor Play 8T Pro
- Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Oppo A79
- Samsung Galaxy F14 4G vs Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
- Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G vs Oscal Pilot 1
- Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G vs ZTE Blade V70
- Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G vs vivo Y29s
- Blackview OSCAL TIGER 8 5G vs Lava Blaze Duo