Side-by-side technical data

Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro

Compare up to four phones using typed, normalized technical data. Measurements stay numeric, capabilities stay boolean, and options stay comparable.

Add another phone
Add another phone

The verdict

Neither runs away with it: each wins something.

Which one is for you?

Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F, if you care about…

Weight
154 g
against 206 g
Resistance Features
IP67, MIL-STD-810G
against IP64

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro, if you care about…

Battery Capacity
6,000 mAh
against 2,200 mAh
RAM Capacity
8 GB
against 1.5 GB
Wi-Fi Standards
Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6E
against Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n
Storage Type
UFS 3.1
against eMMC 4.5

Specification comparison

Performance

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Processor Model Samsung Exynos 3475 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
Processor Process Size 28 nm 4 nm Best value
Graphics GPU Mali-T720 Qualcomm Adreno 710
Storage Type eMMC 4.5 UFS 3.1 Best value
Maximum CPU Clock 1.3 GHz 2.4 GHz Best value
Maximum Storage Capacity 8 GB 256 GB Best value
AnTuTu Score — 550,000
Geekbench 6 Single-Core — —
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core — —
CPU Description Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 Octa-core CPU with 4 Cortex-A78 cores at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz.
Processor Type Quad-Core Octa-Core
64-Bit Processor — Yes
RAM Capacity 1.5 GB 8 GB Best value
RAM Type — LPDDR5X
Expandable Storage Yes Yes
AnTuTu version — v10
3DMark Wild Life Extreme — —
Maximum memory card — —

Design

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Body Colors Grey Green, Black
Body Thickness 10 mm 8.1 mm Best value
Body Width 70.1 mm 78.2 mm
Body Height 132.9 mm 162.4 mm
Weight 154 g Best value 206 g
Usable Surface 61.9 % 86.8 % Best value
Body Materials — Glass, Plastic
Resistance Features IP67, MIL-STD-810G Best value IP64
Waterproof Depth 1 m 2 m Best value
Drop Resistance Class — —
Repairability Class — —
Foldable No No
Rugged Build No No
Drop Test Count — —
Unfolded thickness 10 mm —
QWERTY keyboard — —

Battery

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Battery Efficiency Rating — —
Battery Capacity 2,200 mAh 6,000 mAh Best value
Battery Type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Fast Charge Power — 45 W
Battery Features — Fast Charging, Bypass Charging, Non-Removable, Reverse Charging, Battery Level Indicator, Charger Included, Rechargeable
Battery Endurance — —
Wireless charging power — —
Charge cycles — —
Talk time 13 h —
Standby time — —
Music playback time 42 h —
Reverse wireless charging power — —

Display

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Display Aspect Ratio 5:3 19.5:9
Display Technology PLS LCD Super AMOLED Best value
Peak Display Brightness — —
Display Diagonal 4.5″ 6.7″ Best value
Display Horizontal Resolution 480 px 1,080 px Best value
Display Vertical Resolution 800 px 2,340 px Best value
Display Pixel Density 207 ppi 385 ppi Best value
Display Refresh Rate — 120 Hz
Touch Sampling Rate — —
Display Contrast Ratio — —
Display Features — Hole-Punch Notch, Gorilla Glass, DCI-P3, Scratch Resistant, Capacitive Touch, Multi-Touch, Frameless, Always-On Display
Integrated Projector No No
Projector Brightness — —
Projector Horizontal Resolution — —
Projector Vertical Resolution — —
Cover display diagonal — —
Cover display refresh rate — —
Cover display peak brightness — —
Display colors — —

Sensors

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Fingerprint Sensor Placement — Side

Sensor

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Sensor Features Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Compass Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor

Software

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Operating System Android 6 Android 16
OS Family Android Android
OS Version 6 16 Best value
OS Update Support — 6 years
Direct OS Updates — No
Google Services — Yes
Web browser — —
Java (J2ME) — —
Widevine L1 — Yes

Connectivity

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
SIM Configurations Micro-SIM Dual Nano-SIM, eSIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby Best value
Cellular Bands 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B850, 3G UMTS B900, 3G UMTS 1900, 3G UMTS 2100, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B20 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B850, 3G UMTS B900, 3G UMTS 1700 AWS, 3G UMTS 1900, 3G UMTS 2100, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B2, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B4, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B12, 4G LTE B17, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B26, 4G LTE B28B, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41, 4G LTE B66, 5G NR n1, 5G NR n3, 5G NR n5, 5G NR n7, 5G NR n8, 5G NR n28b, 5G NR n38, 5G NR n40, 5G NR n41, 5G NR n66, 5G NR n77, 5G NR n78
Cellular Technologies GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G Best value
Wi-Fi Standards Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6E Best value
Wi-Fi Features Dual Band, Wi-Fi Direct Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, MIMO
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.1 Best value
Bluetooth Profiles A2DP, LE A2DP, LE, ASHA
Navigation Systems GPS, GLONASS GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS Best value
Connectivity Features 3.5 mm Audio Jack, NFC, FM Radio, microUSB, USB 2.0 NFC, USB Type-C, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB OTG, USB Host 2.0, eSIM, VoLTE, Computer Sync, OTA Sync, Tethering, USB 2.0
USB Version microUSB USB 2.0
SAR American Head 1.02 W/kg 0.87 W/kg Best value
SAR American Body 1.31 W/kg —
SAR (EU) head 0.78 W/kg 0.5 W/kg Best value
SAR (EU) body 1.37 W/kg 0.98 W/kg Best value
Messaging — —
Max. download speed — 2,900 Mbps
Max. upload speed — 1,600 Mbps

Audio

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Microphone Count — —
Audio Features A2DP, LE, Loudspeaker Stereo Speakers, Dolby Atmos Best value
Alert types — —

Technical

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
EAN / GTIN — —
UPC — —
Launch price — —
MPN — —
Launch price (USD) — —

Features

Specification Galaxy Xcover 3 G389F Galaxy F70 Pro
Built-in functions — —
Google

Follow NeoTeo on Google to see more of our stories

Add as a preferred source on Google