Side-by-side technical data
Wiko T20 vs Blackview Oscal FLAT 2C
Comparison between Wiko T20 and Blackview Oscal FLAT 2C: camera, battery, fast charging, display, performance and colors, side by side. More phones from Wiko and Blackview.
The verdict
Your pick: Wiko T20, ahead on Camera and Battery & charging. Unless Connectivity decides it for you.
| Category | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Design & display | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Performance & hardware | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Camera | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Connectivity | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| Battery & charging | 5.8 | 5.0 |
Which one is for you?
Wiko T20, if you care about…
- RAM Capacity
- 4 GB
- against 2 GB
- Maximum Storage Capacity
- 128 GB
- against 64 GB
- Weight
- 186 g
- against 193 g
- Fast Charge Power
- 10 W
- against 5 W
Blackview Oscal FLAT 2C, if you care about…
- AnTuTu Score
- 251,400
- against 67,000
- Wi-Fi Standards
- Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
- against Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
- Bluetooth Version
- Bluetooth 5.0
- against Bluetooth 4.2
- OS Version
- 14
- against 13
Specification comparison
Performance
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | Unisoc SC9863A1 | Unisoc T603 |
| Processor Process Size | 22 nm | 12 nm Best value |
| Graphics GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Maximum CPU Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz Best value |
| Maximum Storage Capacity | 128 GB Best value | 64 GB |
| AnTuTu Score | 67,000 | 251,400 Best value |
| Geekbench 6 Single-Core | 164 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi-Core | 725 | — |
| CPU Description | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | 2× Cortex-A75 at 1.8 GHz + 6× Cortex-A55 at 1.6 GHz |
| Processor Type | Octa-Core | Octa-Core |
| 64-Bit Processor | Yes | Yes |
| RAM Capacity | 4 GB Best value | 2 GB |
| RAM Type | DDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Expandable Storage | Yes | Yes |
| AnTuTu version | v8 | v10 |
Design
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Body Colors | Black, Green, Blue | Black, Cyan |
| Body Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.7 mm Best value |
| Body Width | 75.9 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Body Height | 164.5 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Weight | 186 g Best value | 193 g |
| Usable Surface | 82.8 % | 84 % Best value |
| Body Materials | Plastic | Plastic |
| Drop Resistance Class | — | C |
| Repairability Class | — | B |
| Drop Test Count | — | 90 |
Battery
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Efficiency Rating | — | B |
| Battery Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Polymer |
| Fast Charge Power | 10 W Best value | 5 W |
| Battery Features | Fast Charging, Reverse Charging, Non-Removable, Battery Level Indicator, Charger Included, Rechargeable Best value | Fast Charging, Non-Removable |
| Charge cycles | — | 1,100 |
Display
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Display Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Display Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Display Diagonal | 6.56″ | 6.56″ |
| Display Horizontal Resolution | 720 px | 720 px |
| Display Vertical Resolution | 1,612 px | 1,612 px |
| Display Pixel Density | 269 ppi Best value | 267 ppi |
| Display Refresh Rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Display Features | Gorilla Glass, IPS LCD, Water Drop Notch, Capacitive Touch, Multi-Touch, Frameless | Water Drop Notch, Curved Glass, Capacitive Touch, Multi-Touch, Frameless |
Sensors
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint Sensor Placement | Side | Side |
Sensor
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Features | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor |
Software
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| OS Family | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 13 | 14 Best value |
| Google Services | Yes | Yes |
Connectivity
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| SIM Configurations | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby, Dual SIM |
| Cellular Bands | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B2, 3G UMTS B3, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B28A, 4G LTE B28B, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41 | 2G GSM 1900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B19, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B28B, 4G LTE B28A, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41 |
| Cellular Technologies | GSM, HSPA, UMTS, LTE | — |
| Wi-Fi Standards | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) Best value |
| Wi-Fi Features | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 Best value |
| Bluetooth Profiles | A2DP | A2DP, HID |
| Navigation Systems | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou Best value | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| Connectivity Features | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB OTG, USB Type-C, Computer Sync, OTA Sync, FM Radio, Tethering | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, Computer Sync, NFC, OTA Sync, FM Radio, Tethering, VoLTE, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB OTG, USB Type-C |
| USB Version | USB Type-C | — |
| SAR (EU) head | 0.994 W/kg | — |
| SAR (EU) body | 1.596 W/kg | — |
| Max. download speed | 300 Mbps | — |
| Max. upload speed | 150 Mbps | — |
Audio
| Specification | T20 | Oscal FLAT 2C |
|---|---|---|
| Audio Features | A2DP | A2DP, HID |
Related comparisons
- Wiko T20 vs Blackview Wave 8
- Wiko T20 vs Philips S6210 Essence 10
- Wiko T20 vs itel P40 Plus
- Wiko T20 vs ZTE Blade A54
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 2C vs Phonemax R4 Mini
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 2C vs Philips S6210 Essence 10
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 2C vs Cubot A1
- Blackview Oscal FLAT 2C vs Blackview OSCAL Marine 3
