Side-by-side technical data
Xiaomi Mi CC9e vs vivo NEX Dual Display
Comparison between Xiaomi Mi CC9e and vivo NEX Dual Display: camera, battery, fast charging, display, performance and colors, side by side. More phones from Xiaomi and vivo.
The verdict
Your pick: vivo NEX Dual Display, ahead on Design & display and Performance & hardware. Unless Battery & charging decides it for you.
| Category | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Design & display | 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Performance & hardware | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| Camera | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Connectivity | 5.0 | 4.8 |
| Battery & charging | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Which one is for you?
Xiaomi Mi CC9e, if you care about…
- Battery Capacity
- 4,030 mAh
- against 3,500 mAh
- Weight
- 173.8 g
- against 199 g
- Expandable Storage
- Yes
- against No
vivo NEX Dual Display, if you care about…
- RAM Capacity
- 10 GB
- against 6 GB
- Maximum Storage Capacity
- 256 GB
- against 128 GB
- Display Pixel Density
- 403 ppi
- against 286 ppi
- Fast Charge Power
- 22.5 W
- against 18 W
Specification comparison
Performance
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Processor Process Size | 11 nm | 10 nm Best value |
| Graphics GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Maximum CPU Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz Best value |
| Maximum Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB Best value |
| AnTuTu Score | — | 346,833 |
| CPU Description | Octa-core: four 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores and four 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores. | Octa-core (4×2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold and 4×1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Processor Type | Octa-Core | Octa-Core |
| 64-Bit Processor | Yes | Yes |
| RAM Capacity | 6 GB | 10 GB Best value |
| RAM Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Expandable Storage | Yes Best value | No |
| AnTuTu version | — | v8 |
Design
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Body Colors | Black, Blue, White | Blue |
| Body Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.1 mm Best value |
| Body Width | 71.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Body Height | 153.5 mm | 157.2 mm |
| Weight | 173.8 g Best value | 199 g |
| Usable Surface | 80.3 % | 84.7 % Best value |
| Body Materials | Glass, Plastic | — |
Battery
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 4,030 mAh Best value | 3,500 mAh |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Fast Charge Power | 18 W | 22.5 W Best value |
| Battery Features | Fast Charging, Battery Level Indicator, Rechargeable | Fast Charging, Battery Level Indicator, Rechargeable |
Display
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Display Aspect Ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Display Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Display Diagonal | 6.01″ | 6.39″ Best value |
| Display Horizontal Resolution | 720 px | 1,080 px Best value |
| Display Vertical Resolution | 1,560 px | 2,340 px Best value |
| Display Pixel Density | 286 ppi | 403 ppi Best value |
| Display Features | Gorilla Glass 5, Touchscreen | Secondary Display, Touchscreen |
| Cover display diagonal | — | 5.49″ |
Sensors
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint Sensor Placement | Under Display | Under Display |
Sensor
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Features | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Compass | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Compass |
Software
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 9 | Android 9 |
| OS Family | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 9 | 9 |
Connectivity
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| SIM Configurations | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Cellular Bands | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B850, 3G UMTS B900, 3G UMTS 2100, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B34, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B39, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41 | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B850, 3G UMTS B900, 3G UMTS 1900, 3G UMTS 2100, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B19, LTE B28, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B39, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41 |
| Cellular Technologies | GSM, CDMA, HSPA, LTE, 4G | GSM, CDMA, HSPA, LTE, 4G |
| Wi-Fi Standards | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac |
| Wi-Fi Features | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Direct | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Bluetooth Profiles | A2DP, LE, aptX HD | A2DP, LE |
| Navigation Systems | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou | GPS, BeiDou, Galileo |
| Connectivity Features | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, Infrared, FM Radio, USB Type-C, NFC | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, Infrared, USB OTG, USB Type-C |
| USB Version | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Max. download speed | 450 Mbps | 1,024 Mbps Best value |
| Max. upload speed | 50 Mbps | 50 Mbps |
Audio
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Count | 2 | 2 |
| Audio Features | Loudspeaker | Loudspeaker, 32-bit/192 kHz Audio |
Technical
| Specification | Mi CC9e | NEX Dual Display |
|---|---|---|
| Model numbers | — | V1821A, 1813, V1821T |
Related comparisons
- Xiaomi Mi CC9e vs Huawei P30 lite New Edition
- Xiaomi Mi CC9e vs Sharp Aquos Zero
- Xiaomi Mi CC9e vs Doogee S95 Pro
- Xiaomi Mi CC9e vs Xiaomi Black Shark Helo
- vivo NEX Dual Display vs Xiaomi Black Shark Helo
- vivo NEX Dual Display vs Meizu 15 Plus
- vivo NEX Dual Display vs Sharp Aquos Zero
- vivo NEX Dual Display vs Doogee S95 Pro
