Side-by-side technical data

ZTE Blade 10 vs vivo Y95

Comparison between ZTE Blade 10 and vivo Y95: camera, battery, fast charging, display, performance and colors, side by side. More phones from ZTE and vivo.

The verdict

Your pick: ZTE Blade 10, ahead on Design & display and Camera. Unless Battery & charging decides it for you.

Category
Category Blade 10 Y95
Design & display 6.0 5.3
Performance & hardware 3.1 3.0
Camera 3.5 3.0
Connectivity 3.8 3.5
Battery & charging 2.6 3.8

Which one is for you?

ZTE Blade 10, if you care about…

Wi-Fi Standards
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac
against Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
RAM Type
DDR4
against DDR3
Display Pixel Density
400 ppi
against 270 ppi
Body Thickness
7.9 mm
against 8.3 mm

vivo Y95, if you care about…

Battery Capacity
4,030 mAh
against 3,100 mAh
RAM Capacity
4 GB
against 3 GB
Max. upload speed
75 Mbps
against 50 Mbps

Specification comparison

Performance

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Processor Model MediaTek Helio P60 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Processor Process Size 12 nm 12 nm
Graphics GPU Mali-G72 MP3 Qualcomm Adreno 505
Storage Type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1
Maximum CPU Clock 2 GHz Best value 1.95 GHz
Maximum Storage Capacity 64 GB 64 GB
Geekbench 6 Single-Core 299 Best value 199
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core 1,155 Best value 795
CPU Description — Octa-core CPU with four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.95 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.45 GHz.
Processor Type Octa-Core Octa-Core
64-Bit Processor Yes Yes
RAM Capacity 3 GB 4 GB Best value
RAM Type DDR4 Best value DDR3
Expandable Storage Yes Yes
Maximum memory card — 256 GB

Design

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Body Colors — Black, Purple, Red
Body Thickness 7.9 mm Best value 8.3 mm
Body Width 75.2 mm 75.1 mm
Body Height 158 mm 155.1 mm
Weight 165 g 163.5 g Best value
Usable Surface — 82.9 %
Body Materials Plastic Glass, Plastic

Battery

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Battery Capacity 3,100 mAh 4,030 mAh Best value
Battery Type Li-Polymer —
Fast Charge Power 18 W 18 W
Battery Features Battery Level Indicator, Fast Charging, Rechargeable, Non-Removable Battery Level Indicator, Rechargeable

Display

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Display Aspect Ratio 19:9 19:9
Display Technology IPS LCD IPS LCD
Display Diagonal 6.3″ Best value 6.22″
Display Horizontal Resolution 1,080 px Best value 720 px
Display Vertical Resolution 2,280 px Best value 1,520 px
Display Pixel Density 400 ppi Best value 270 ppi
Display Features Touchscreen, Water Drop Notch Touchscreen

Sensors

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Fingerprint Sensor Placement Rear Rear

Sensor

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Sensor Features Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyroscope Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Compass

Software

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Operating System Android 9 Android 8.1
OS Family Android Android
OS Version 9 Best value 8

Connectivity

Specification Blade 10 Y95
SIM Configurations Dual Nano-SIM Dual Nano-SIM
Cellular Bands — 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B850, 3G UMTS B900, 3G UMTS 2100, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B34, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B39, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41
Cellular Technologies LTE, 4G GSM, CDMA, HSPA, LTE, 4G
Wi-Fi Standards Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Best value Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi Features Dual Band Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.2 Bluetooth 4.2
Bluetooth Profiles A2DP A2DP, LE
Navigation Systems GPS GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou Best value
Connectivity Features 3.5 mm Audio Jack, NFC, FM Radio, USB Type-C 3.5 mm Audio Jack, FM Radio, microUSB, USB OTG
USB Version USB 2.0 microUSB
SAR American Head 0.3 W/kg Best value 1.09 W/kg
SAR American Body 0.64 W/kg 0.32 W/kg Best value
Max. download speed 300 Mbps Best value 150 Mbps
Max. upload speed 50 Mbps 75 Mbps Best value

Audio

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Microphone Count 2 2
Audio Features — Loudspeaker

Technical

Specification Blade 10 Y95
Model numbers — 1807
Google

Follow NeoTeo on Google to see more of our stories

Add as a preferred source on Google