NeoTeo's verdict
Which of the two is the better buy
The LG Q92 5G is the most complete choice for performance, display, and connectivity: its 6GB of RAM, UFS 2.1 storage, and 5G set it apart from the LG Q61 and LG Q51. The Q51 is the camera pick, while the Q61 only makes sense if it costs less.
The Q92 5G combines 1080 px horizontal resolution, 2400 px vertical resolution, and 395 ppi; the Q61 matches 1080 px and 395 ppi but drops to 2340 px vertically, while the Q51 has 720 px, 1520 px, and 259 ppi. Their processors are the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G, MediaTek Helio P35, and MediaTek Helio P22, respectively.
The Q51’s main camera is 13MP versus 48MP on the Q61 and Q92 5G, but the Q92 5G adds 4K video and a 32MP front camera, against 16MP and 13MP. It also brings a rugged build and 128GB of storage, versus 64GB on the Q61 and 32GB on the Q51; all three share a 4,000mAh battery and 15W charging.
LG Q51
The LG Q92 5G is the better buy for those seeking 6GB of RAM, UFS 2.1, 5G, and 4K video.
LG Q92 5G
The LG Q51 is the better buy for those prioritizing its 13MP main camera over the Q61 and Q92 5G’s 48MP cameras.
The verdict
Your pick: LG Q92 5G, ahead on Design & display, Performance & hardware, Connectivity and Battery & charging. Unless Camera decides it for you.
| Category | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design & display | 4.6 | 5.6 | 6.5 |
| Performance & hardware | 2.4 | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| Camera | 6.3 | 5.8 | 5.5 |
| Connectivity | 4.6 | 3.7 | 6.2 |
| Battery & charging | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.3 |
Which one is for you?
LG Q92 5G, if you care about…
- RAM Capacity
- 6 GB
- against 3 GB · 4 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 2.1
- against eMMC 5.1 · eMMC 5.1
- Maximum Storage Capacity
- 128 GB
- against 32 GB · 64 GB
- Weight
- 193 g
- against 203 g
Specification comparison
Performance
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor Model | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P35 | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G |
| Processor Process Size | 12 nm | 12 nm | 7 nm Best value |
| Graphics GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 | Qualcomm Adreno 620 |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 Best value |
| Maximum CPU Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz Best value |
| Maximum Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB | 128 GB Best value |
| AnTuTu Score | 78,000 | — | 379,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single-Core | 233 | — | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi-Core | 723 | — | — |
| CPU Description | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core processor with four 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and four 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. | Octa-core CPU with one 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, one 2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold core, and six 1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. |
| Processor Type | Octa-Core | Octa-Core | Octa-Core |
| 64-Bit Processor | Yes | — | Yes |
| RAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB | 6 GB Best value |
| RAM Type | DDR4 | — | LPDDR4X |
| Expandable Storage | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AnTuTu version | — | — | v9 |
Design
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body Colors | White, Titanium | White | White, Blue, Red, Black, Green, Orange |
| Body Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm Best value | 8.5 mm |
| Body Width | 77.5 mm | 77.5 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Body Height | 164.5 mm | 164.5 mm | 166.5 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | — | 193 g Best value |
| Usable Surface | 82.7 % | 82.1 % | 83.5 % Best value |
| Body Materials | — | — | Plastic, Glass |
| Resistance Features | MIL-STD-810G | MIL-STD-810G | IP68, MIL-STD-810G |
| Waterproof Depth | — | — | 1.5 m |
| Rugged Build | No | No | Yes Best value |
Battery
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Po | Li-Polymer |
| Fast Charge Power | — | — | 15 W |
| Battery Features | Battery Level Indicator, Fast Charging, Rechargeable | — | Fast Charging, Wireless Charging, Non-Removable, Battery Level Indicator, Charger Included, Rechargeable |
| Wireless charging power | — | — | 9 W |
Display
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display Aspect Ratio | 19:9 | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Display Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Display Diagonal | 6.5″ | 6.53″ | 6.67″ Best value |
| Display Horizontal Resolution | 720 px | 1,080 px Best value | 1,080 px Best value |
| Display Vertical Resolution | 1,520 px | 2,340 px | 2,400 px Best value |
| Display Pixel Density | 259 ppi | 395 ppi Best value | 395 ppi Best value |
| Display Features | IPS LCD, Touchscreen | Scratch Resistant, IPS LCD | Water Drop Notch, Always-On Display, DCI-P3, Scratch Resistant, Gorilla Glass 5, Capacitive Touch, Multi-Touch, Frameless, Touchscreen |
Sensors
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint Sensor Placement | Rear | Rear | Side |
Sensor
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensor Features | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Compass | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Compass | Fingerprint Sensor, Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall Sensor, Light Sensor, Proximity Sensor |
Software
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 10 | Android 9 | Android 10 |
| OS Family | Android | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 10 Best value | 9 | 10 Best value |
| Google Services | — | — | Yes |
| Widevine L1 | — | — | Yes |
Connectivity
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIM Configurations | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual SIM Best value | Single Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual SIM Dual Standby Best value |
| Cellular Bands | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 3G UMTS B2, 3G UMTS B1, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B20 | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B850, 3G UMTS B900, 3G UMTS 1900, 3G UMTS B1 | 2G GSM 850, 2G GSM 900, 2G GSM 1800, 2G GSM 1900, 3G UMTS B1, 3G UMTS B2, 3G UMTS B3, 3G UMTS B5, 3G UMTS B8, 4G LTE B1, 4G LTE B2, 4G LTE B3, 4G LTE B4, 4G LTE B5, 4G LTE B7, 4G LTE B8, 4G LTE B12, 4G LTE B17, 4G LTE B20, 4G LTE B28A, 4G LTE B28B, 4G LTE B32, 4G LTE B38, 4G LTE B39, 4G LTE B40, 4G LTE B41, 5G NR n1, 5G NR n3, 5G NR n28a, 5G NR n28b, 5G NR n78 |
| Cellular Technologies | GSM, HSPA, UMTS, LTE, 4G | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE, 5G Best value |
| Wi-Fi Standards | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g |
| Wi-Fi Features | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Direct | Dual Band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, DLNA |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Bluetooth Profiles | A2DP, LE | A2DP, LE | A2DP, LE |
| Navigation Systems | GPS | GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou Best value |
| Connectivity Features | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, NFC, USB Type-C, USB Charging, DLNA | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, NFC, USB Type-C | 3.5 mm Audio Jack, NFC, USB Type-C, USB Charging, USB Mass Storage, USB OTG, Computer Sync, DLNA, Infrared, FM Radio, Tethering, VoLTE, OTA Sync |
| USB Version | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| SAR (EU) head | — | — | 1.13 W/kg |
| SAR (EU) body | — | — | 0.691 W/kg |
| Max. download speed | 300 Mbps | — | 3,700 Mbps Best value |
| Max. upload speed | 75 Mbps | — | 1,600 Mbps Best value |
Audio
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microphone Count | 2 | — | — |
| Audio Features | Stereo Speakers | A2DP, LE | Stereo Speakers, A2DP, LE |
Technical
| Specification | Q51 | Q61 | Q92 5G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model numbers | LM-Q510N | LM-Q630N | LM-Q920N |
Related comparisons
- LG Q51 vs Cat S62 Pro
- LG Q51 vs Hisense F50+
- LG Q51 vs Blackview BV9100
- LG Q51 vs Oppo F11 Pro
- LG Q61 vs Tecno Phantom 9
- LG Q61 vs Realme Narzo 30A
- LG Q61 vs Samsung Galaxy A41
- LG Q61 vs Nokia 7.2
- LG Q92 5G vs Realme X50t
- LG Q92 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F52 5G
- LG Q92 5G vs Energizer Hard Case G5
- LG Q92 5G vs Honor X20
