Any user who masters one of the main animation tools can give movement (to a certain extent) to a static image, but sometimes we just want to achieve that goal quickly and easily, creating small loops in GIF format. Motion is a portal that offers us exactly that, with a slight difference: its animations have a geometric base, generating multiple shapes that adapt to the colors and lines of the original material. There is an important random component in Motion, as well as some machine learning in the background…
Photos can be wonderful, but once they gain movement, the story changes completely. You only need to look at the popularity of animated GIFs (and their complete dominance of the meme universe) to understand this. The big question is: How do we do it? How can we transform images into animations without having to spend whole weeks absorbing the technical details of a professional program? That's when the concept of webapp, machine learning, and a couple of parallel projects that serve as a source of inspiration come to the rescue. The result is a curious platform called Motion.
How to transform images into geometric animations with Motion
The first step requires us to configure the type of output (GIF or static image), the shape that will dominate the processing (triangles, rectangles, circles, or all at once), and the artistic style (standard, abstract, and realistic). Motion is compatible with independent images and online video, but we recommend starting with a photo, since the work extends over several minutes. Motion will show us a console with low-level information, and then present the finished animation. From there you can save it locally, or share it through social networks. Don't hesitate to experiment by combining shapes and styles. Some don't work very well with certain images, but occasionally, the mixture is perfect.
Motion applies machine learning and a hill-climbing algorithm for the generation of animations. When it comes to converting the chain of frames into an animated GIF, it uses FFMPEG and ImageMagick. If we consider that all its operation is reduced to a couple of clicks and represents no cost to the user, I think Motion is a very satisfactory tool. Now, I have no doubt that experts in image editing will obtain superior results with their tools, but Motion is not bad at all to begin with.
https://old.neoteo.com/como-agregar-animaciones-a-tus-videos/
