Google said the Google Play apps cited in Wired’s investigation had already been removed and that it had suspended hundreds of additional apps, according to an Android Authority report published November 3, 2026. The statement covered the cited Play apps and Google’s additional suspensions. It did not describe the status of every app and website in the wider network.
How ordinary-looking apps could hide a generator
Wired described a network of roughly 400 apps and websites linked to Chinese-language developers. The network’s reported hidden features included tools for generating violent AI images and video. Examples of ordinary-looking app disguises included language tutoring, AI pet-photo editing and workout coaching.
In Android Authority’s account of the investigation, a server could determine whether an installed app displayed its ordinary interface or unlocked a hidden generator. Installing an app after clicking a Meta ad containing explicit deepfake material was one possible trigger researchers identified, not a universal condition.
Store search was another reported discovery route
In a separate account published April 16, 2026, Chosun reported that TTP found ads for nudify apps in store search results, related autocomplete suggestions and recommendations for similar apps after a user opened a listing. Those findings describe routes through store search and recommendations alongside the reported external ads and concealed app behavior.
Chosun also reported that TTP’s search returned 46 App Store results and 49 Google Play results. About 40% were said to have the relevant AI capability. That is a search-result count and an approximate share, not a full count of either store.
What the different counts measure
The roughly 400 figure combines apps and websites. An earlier app-focused finding cited by Android Authority counted around 38 apps. They are different units and scopes, so the figures do not establish a measured increase.
The arithmetic helps explain why the numbers may appear similar: 46 plus 49 search results makes 95, and about 40% of 95 is roughly 38. But Chosun’s account does not establish that its search results were the same group of apps behind the earlier count.
Apple’s explanation of its review
Apple told Wired that the apps it discussed complied with its rules when reviewed, then said developers changed the websites supplying their content and promoted the apps through third-party pornographic ads. That is Apple’s account of how those apps passed review and later changed. For context on Apple’s separate review framework, see NeoTeo’s coverage of its App Store rules for AI apps.
Apple clarifies App Store rules for AI content and hidden features