A November 3 report citing The Wall Street Journal said institutional investors had urged Anthropic and its advisers to consider a $1.5 trillion to $1.6 trillion valuation for a possible IPO, below roughly $2 trillion discussed in recent months. The suggested range was an investor position, not an IPO price set by Anthropic.

The comparison matters because a simple annualization of Anthropic’s reported first-half 2026 revenue puts the lower range at about 46.0 to 49.1 times revenue. That calculation uses an assumption, not a full-year revenue forecast.

What the reported valuation range implies

A paid STARTRADER press release reported $16.3 billion in first-half 2026 revenue. Doubling that six-month figure gives $32.6 billion in assumed annual revenue. A valuation-to-revenue multiple divides a company’s valuation by its annual revenue; applying that calculation gives:

Valuation discussedAssumed annual revenueImplied revenue multiple
$1.5 trillion to $1.6 trillion, reported investor target$32.6 billion46.0× to 49.1×
Roughly $2 trillion, discussed in recent months$32.6 billion61.3×

The $16.3 billion figure comes from STARTRADER’s paid press release. Doubling it assumes the first-half pace continues unchanged; it does not account for how revenue might vary over the rest of the year. On that same assumption, the reported lower range implies a smaller multiple than roughly $2 trillion. The arithmetic alone does not establish what Anthropic is worth.

NeoTeo’s earlier coverage of Anthropic’s possible IPO and the roughly $2 trillion expectation examined that higher figure. The newer report describes a lower range some investors wanted the company and its advisers to consider.

A separate hypothetical earnings calculation

At a hypothetical 25× earnings multiple, a $2 trillion valuation corresponds to $80 billion in annual net profit: $2 trillion divided by 25. That multiple comes from a Reddit commenter’s scenario, not a forecast for Anthropic. The calculation illustrates how much the assumed earnings multiple affects the profit figure attached to a proposed valuation.

Why investors reportedly urged caution

The November 3 account cited volatile technology markets, investor exposure to AI-related investments, opposition to new data centers, and uncertainty about when cloud providers will earn returns on AI spending. Those were reported concerns alongside the lower valuation target; the account did not establish that any one of them caused investors to suggest it.